首页> 外文OA文献 >The Implementation of Authentic and Non Authentic Material of Procedure Text Students\u27 Speaking
【2h】

The Implementation of Authentic and Non Authentic Material of Procedure Text Students\u27 Speaking

机译:程序文本学生口语材料真伪材料的实现\ u27口语

摘要

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan yang signifikan dalam pencapaian berbicara siswa yang diajar dengan menggunakan authentic dan non authentic material. Penelitian ini dilakukan di kelas XI SMAN. Hasil pre-test di kelas authentic material adalah 60.5, sedangkan di kelas non authentic material adalah 70.45. Hasil post-test di kelas authentic material adalah 78.2, sedangkan di kelas non authentic material adalah 79.38. Ini berarti bahwa ada perbedaan yang signifikan setelah kedua media diberikan. Total nilai dalam semua aspek berbicara di kelas authentic material adalah 17.7 poin, sedangkan di kelas non authentic material adalah 8.93. Ada perbedaan yang signifikan di semua aspek berbicara antara media authentic material dan media non Authentic material. The objectives of this research were to find out whether there was significant differences in students\u27 speaking achievement who were taught by using authentic and non authentic material and to find out whether there was aspect of two media mostly affect. The research was conducted at the eleventh grade of SMAN. The result of pre-test in authentic material class was 60.5, while in non authentic material class was 70.45. The result of post-test in authentic material class was 78.2, while in non authentic material class was 79.38. It means that there was significant difference after treatments were given. The total gain in all aspects of speaking of authentic material was 17.7 points, while in non authentic material was 8.93. It means that there was significant difference in all aspects of speaking between authentic material and non authentic material media. Keywords: authentic material , non-authentic material, speaking ability
机译:这项研究的目的是确定通过使用真实材料和非真实材料而教给学生的口语水平是否存在显着差异。这项研究是在SMAN的XI类中进行的。真实材料类别的预测试结果为60.5,而非真实材料类别的预测试结果为70.45。真实材料类别的测试后结果为78.2,而非真实材料类别的测试后结果为79.38。这意味着在给出两种媒体之后,存在显着差异。真实材料分类的各个方面的总价值是17.7分,而非真实材料分类的总价值是8.93。真实材料和非真实材料在说话的各个方面都存在显着差异。这项研究的目的是找出使用真实和非真实材料教给学生的口语成绩是否存在显着差异,并找出两种媒体是否在很大程度上影响着他们。该研究是在SMAN的11年级进行的。真实材料类别的预测试结果为60.5,而非真实材料类别的预测试结果为70.45。真实材料类别的后测结果为78.2,而非真实材料类别的后测结果为79.38。这意味着给予治疗后有显着差异。讲真实材料的各个方面的总收益为17.7分,而不讲真实材料的总收益为8.93分。这意味着真实材料和非真实媒体材料在说话的各个方面都有很大的不同。关键字:真实材料,非真实材料,口语能力

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号